Monday, July 30, 2012

The temple has suffered reputational losses in the prosecutor's office

The temple has suffered reputational losses in the prosecutor's officeSociety of Consumer Protection wants to prosecute for criticism of the Fund Christ the Savior Cathedral

Management of the Fund Cathedral of Christ the Savior asked the prosecutor's office, which required the Company to attract consumer protection (OZPP) "Social control" to "statutory responsibility" for the dissemination of information discrediting business reputation of the fund. The occasion was made public earlier statement OZPP accusing the fund of funds and misuse of the transformation of the temple in the business center.July 24 at the official website of the Society for the Protection of Consumer Rights "Social control" an article "OZPP asks competent authorities to check the activities of the Fund's Cathedral of Christ the Savior." "In fact, under the guise of restoring the church built a business center, where a proper religious needs received less than 7% of the area - said to her. - These actions can be described as nothing but a massive scam, which defrauded hundreds of thousands turned out to be Russian citizens." In this paper, OZPP asked city prosecutor's office and the State Inspection for Control over the use of real estate in Moscow to check on the fact of misuse of the premises and the budget fund. "In case of confirmation (narusheniy. -" b ") to bring to the statutory responsibility of the perpetrators and take action to expulsion from the territory of the Cathedral of Christ the Savior commercial firms illegally occupying these premises," - said in a note.Fund of the Cathedral of Christ the Savior (FHHS) was founded in 1994 (originally called the Foundation for financial support for reconstruction of HHS), he manages the temple complex of buildings with an area of ​​34.1 thousand square meters. m In 2011 the fund was 239.9 million rubles. subsidies from the budget of Moscow (in 2012 approved the grant of 372.5 million rubles. "to recover the costs of maintenance and operation of the" church). All the rooms of the temple are at FHHS in trust.The Foundation felt that this information is false, and filed a complaint with the prosecutor's office in Moscow. "The article contains a statement about misuse of funds received in the form of donations. And the author has not provided any evidence of" massive fraud "and other events in real life - said in a statement, the Executive Director FHHS Basil Poddevalina. - We believe that the above information discredits the business reputation of fund and ask prosecutors to bring perpetrators to statutory liability. "Recall that the June 4, 2012 OZPP already paid a claim in Khamovnichesky Court in Moscow, calling into question the legitimacy of trade conducted farmstead Church of Christ the Savior: "In fact, in the church operates a business center, offering consumers a wide range of commercial proposals" (see " Live "on July 10). However, the court rejected the plaintiffs' claims, admitting that the administration of the church is not engaged in the realization of commercial products."7% of the area, which are written by representatives of OZPP - premises occupied by staff of the patriarchal monastery, but about the actual religious premises, that is, Christ the Savior Cathedral, the Church of the Transfiguration, our opponents forgot to mention - said the" b "the first deputy executive director FHHS Sergey Semenenko. - The lease shall be only 3.5% of the premises of the complex. Tenants - the organization, mainly associated with the life of the complex. " According to him, "tenants are generally not placed in the building of the temple, and located in a detached building - the former management pool" Moscow ", renovated the fund at its own expense" (interview with Mr. Semenenko read on kommersant.ru)."We are surprised that the fund appealed to the prosecutor's office - said," b "of the representatives of the Fund Chairman Mikhail OZPP Anshakov. - If we discredits the business reputation, we had to go to court, the prosecution can not interfere in it." "In this case the weak prospects - had to apply to the court - a lawyer confirmed RSUH Professor Anatoly Pchelintsev. - Although prosecutors could qualify as a libel action OZPP, then it will have to transfer, to the investigative committee for criminal prosecution."

No comments:

Post a Comment